Comments on: Wave Unread Navigator http://localhost/wp/2009/12/wave-unread-navigator/ this title probably isn't very original Fri, 30 May 2014 19:32:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.1 By: jose http://localhost/wp/2009/12/wave-unread-navigator/comment-page-1/#comment-15907 Fri, 28 May 2010 17:26:25 +0000 http://antimatter15.com/wp/?p=899#comment-15907 It’s working again! Thanks! =)

]]> By: admin http://localhost/wp/2009/12/wave-unread-navigator/comment-page-1/#comment-15904 Sun, 23 May 2010 11:32:35 +0000 http://antimatter15.com/wp/?p=899#comment-15904 That was because of a fix at one point, but but the update had a bug, but then was fixed again in an hour or so, but it seems that the new update has trouble propagating. Try to manually update the extension by going to chrome://extensions and hitting Update

]]> By: jose http://localhost/wp/2009/12/wave-unread-navigator/comment-page-1/#comment-15903 Sat, 22 May 2010 13:15:55 +0000 http://antimatter15.com/wp/?p=899#comment-15903 hi – the wave unread navigator is no longer working after Google made some updates to Wave… it says every blip is unread even if it isn’t . Hope you can find some time to fix it…

]]> By: admin http://localhost/wp/2009/12/wave-unread-navigator/comment-page-1/#comment-15364 Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:51:48 +0000 http://antimatter15.com/wp/?p=899#comment-15364 I’ve added a No-Fill mode, so the free-pencil can be done by changing fill to nothing and using the pen tool. If you find behavioral issues, please file bug reports on google code.

]]> By: admin http://localhost/wp/2009/12/wave-unread-navigator/comment-page-1/#comment-15361 Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:01:07 +0000 http://antimatter15.com/wp/?p=899#comment-15361 Blame WordPress’s Akismet spam filter, its overly strict with classifying real comments with spam. I went through spam list and manually approved your comments. There might be some which are too late to recover, though.

]]> By: Eugene Mirotin http://localhost/wp/2009/12/wave-unread-navigator/comment-page-1/#comment-15245 Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:11:34 +0000 http://antimatter15.com/wp/?p=899#comment-15245 Hi. I have posted 2 more comments but they are not shown. Pre-moderation?

]]> By: nomel http://localhost/wp/2009/12/wave-unread-navigator/comment-page-1/#comment-15241 Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:30:57 +0000 http://antimatter15.com/wp/?p=899#comment-15241 Very very cool. This is a feature that should have been included!

]]> By: Eugene Mirotin http://localhost/wp/2009/12/wave-unread-navigator/comment-page-1/#comment-15219 Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:56:52 +0000 http://antimatter15.com/wp/?p=899#comment-15219 Hello!
Sorry, haven’t checked your answers for several days.
The set of features of http://jsvectoreditor.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/index.html is almost what we need.
The only thing missing is a free pencil, but I’m not sure this feature can be implemented with SVG.

In any case, I have noticed some minor behavioral issues. Will you be interested in fixing and stabilizing the code for money?

]]> By: admin http://localhost/wp/2009/12/wave-unread-navigator/comment-page-1/#comment-15205 Sun, 20 Dec 2009 02:39:33 +0000 http://antimatter15.com/wp/?p=899#comment-15205 I just tried using svg-edit with svgweb again with the most recent trunk editions of both. Sadly, while svgweb has progressed significantly, for instance, it’s now possible to programatically insert svg elements with javascript, something which was not available during the original port, which led to me making a hack (having the the svg element exist before in HTML). Sadly, the progress of svgweb has been outmatched by the improvements done to svg-edit, which now requires several features not implemented in svgweb. Mostly, the including of a svg element within another svg element, which powers zoom and layers. So, at current states, its still not possible to do the integration. Maybe some time later, it will be possible.

]]> By: antimatter15 http://localhost/wp/2009/12/wave-unread-navigator/comment-page-1/#comment-15144 Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:30:54 +0000 http://antimatter15.com/wp/?p=899#comment-15144 I haven’t tried working on it recently, and SVG web has really improved since, but http://code.google.com/p/svgweb/issues/detail?id=417 needs to be implemented (though I might be able to continue using the js-based hackish partial implementation that I have there).

If you don’t need as fully featured an editor as svg-edit, I have this http://code.google.com/p/jsvectoreditor/ which works in IE and modern browsers, but its significantly less powerful.

]]>