Comments on: Working on interface for Animator/Wave http://localhost/wp/2009/08/working-on-interface-for-animatorwave/ this title probably isn't very original Fri, 30 May 2014 19:32:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.1 By: admin http://localhost/wp/2009/08/working-on-interface-for-animatorwave/comment-page-1/#comment-12319 Sat, 15 Aug 2009 20:06:31 +0000 http://antimatter15.com/wp/?p=740#comment-12319 Your post was a really interesting read, I think Raphael is probably much more buggy than dojo.gfx mostly because there’s a larger development effort on the latter and that Raphael is a lot newer. *hopefully* nobody would make an animation in IE, and especially not on the magnitude of several hundred shapes.

WaveSplash (maybe because Flash was originally called FutureSplash Animator), or WaveMotion (cause waves move, lol). Or something else.

]]> By: lrbabe http://localhost/wp/2009/08/working-on-interface-for-animatorwave/comment-page-1/#comment-12296 Sat, 15 Aug 2009 00:47:47 +0000 http://antimatter15.com/wp/?p=740#comment-12296 You name doesn’t need to be explicit. Be imaginative, anything could do, as long as it is catchy.
By the way I wanted to point out a comparison of dojo.gfx and Raphael that I’ve written: http://www.lrbabe.com/?p=217
Although I prefer Raphael’s API and documentation, I found that it can be really slow to create numerous shapes at the same time in IE.

]]>